![]() | Forensic Applications Consulting Technologies, Inc. |
Introduction
Many voters presumed that the marijuana would be as highly regulated as any other legitimate drug;
grown by highly trained professionals in clean, well regulated facilities. And it was presumed that the
owners of which would be in compliance with normal environmental regulations, labor regulations, and all the
rest that one presumes to accompany a legitimate drug dispensation network.
Many voters assumed the drug would be dispensed, like any other drug, from the local pharmacist,
dressed in a nicely pressed shirt and tie, and wearing a nice white lab coat from a gleaming white
dispensary.
The ugly truth is very ugly; and very different.
Based on our extensive experience in legal and illegal grow ops, the typical lawful marijuana grow
operation is not unlike other types of clandestine drug operations; the operator is usually a nefarious
character, who usually has a long criminal record. Marijuana grows are frequently found in the same
shabby, filthy locations that just a few years ago would have been raided by the police. Dispensaries
are frequently homes in your neighborhood, visited at all hours of day and night by arrest warrants just
waiting to happen.
Legal grow operators are virtually identical in operation to the illegal grow operations. As such, there
are direct parallels to legal grow operations and clandestine drug labs. Operators typically ignore
environmental waste regulations, employee health and safety regulations, fire codes, and building
codes. Operators frequently are untrained in commercial aspects of agriculture, drawing instead upon
underground texts from otherwise unknown “publishers.”
Proponents of medical marijuana grows typically skew reality by displaying photographs of
sophisticated gleaming, clean, grow ops staffed by workers in hooded Tyvek suits, wearing respiratory
protection. If that was the typical grow operation, then voters would have received what they
expected.
Commercial Operations
Neighbors of the grows did not occupy their residences with the notion that they would be living next to
an uncontrolled chemical processing plant devoid of regulatory overview.
Chemicals are usually stored in an haphazard and cavalier manner; stockpiled without regard for proper
chemical storage practices.
Furthermore, where the grow operation occurs in an apartment complex or condominium, the risk is
shared with the population of the entire structure.
One of the contaminants of concern is the active ingredient itself: tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), also
known as delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (9-THC), or dronabinol; the main psychoactive substance found
in the cannabis plant.
The residential structure or apartment containing the grow was not designed to control the fugitive
emission of psychoactive substances. Grow operators are neither inclined nor technically competent to
install modern ventilation and waste management controls.
As a result, the young pregnant Mom in the apartment next door, the City Bus Driver in the apartment
above, and the children in the day care provider in the apartment below are all exposed to whatever the
mad scientist grow operator decides is the magic soup of the day.
Furthermore, the City Bus Driver, who has never used marijuana has just failed a mandatory urine
analysis for THC in his blood. In spite of his loud protestations, he is being removed from his job, and
facing disciplinary actions. The unborn child of the pregnant Mom has THC in her blood as well with
unknown developmental consequences. The toddlers in the day care facility are getting their daily hit of
pot with their peanut butter sandwiches – all unknown to them because of an uncontrolled industrial
chemical process taking place next door. Thanks to US Federal HIPAA
regulations, law enforcement, building inspectors, and health officials may not have legal authority
to even inquire if a grow operation is present in the structure.
Ancillary Hazards
Wisdom notwithstanding, many states are now adopting “medical marijuana” statutes. As the citizens of
these states are finding out, the result is a lot more than what they bargained for.
Most marijuana grows are most typically set up in residential homes, apartments, condominiums, and
trailer parks. Structural facilities that were never designed to handle the chemical exposures, waste
streams, and humidity levels typical of such grows.![[Stockpiled
chemicals]](
http://www.forensic-applications.com/marijuana/chemicals.jpg)
FACTs personnel have processed marijuana grows large and small, and one of the most hazardous
situations common in each of the grows was the presence of ultrafine particles (UFPs) and excessive
levels of carbon dioxide (CO2) and carbon monoxide. The growers typically will use industrial grade
propane powered burners to purposely produce elevated levels of CO2 to promote plant growth. The
propane burners also inadvertently produce huge quantities of ultrafine particles, water vapor and
carbon monoxide. As a result, normal residential ventilation is incapable of handling these contaminants.
The concentration of these contaminants can be so high that they can kill a person; FACTs personnel
has assisted in criminal investigations wherein the death of a child occurred in a grow-op.
Chemical hazards are not the only problem. A residential structure was not designed to accommodate
the electrical needs of a grow. The electrical wiring situation in the grow ops are reminiscent of a plate
of spaghetti. Very extensive and elaborate wiring is present inside these houses, and the wiring virtually
never meets electrical code (obviously), and treacherous exposed and convoluted wiring arrangements
are almost always found.
The residential wiring system is simply incapable of handling the electrical needs of a grow. Growers
trying to exceed their legal amounts frequently tap directly into the overhead power lines to obtain the
necessary electrical power.
Invariably found in a grow operation are grow-lights. The grow lights produce massive exposures to UV
light. In turn, the UV spectrum can not only damage unprotected surfaces, but also, the UV light is
energetic enough to break down airborne materials (such as vapors or pesticides, etc) into a soup of
other unknown contaminants with unexpected and unpredictable health consequences. The grow
operation is usually lined with silvered surfaces (see the photo below).
In a legitimate agricultural grow operation, such as a green house or hydroponic house, the UV is
properly shielded pursuant to OSHA regulations and the ventilation also meets OSHA standards. In
marijuana grows, however, even legal “medical marijuana” grows, the operator is essentially an amateur
who is employing industrial operations in a residential setting.
The majority of grows with which we have been involved, employ growers who essentially consider
themselves “environmentally friendly” and as such don't typically use 24D, 2-4-5T, chlordane, lindane,
or the like. More often, they choose to use grow products that market themselves as “organic” (the fact
that the other compounds are also truly organic is not important to the grower).
Another hazard not discussed by the proponents of marijuana grows is the overt criminal element
associated with the operation. For although a very, very, small minority of “medical marijuana” users
are legitimately using marijuana as a therapeutic treatment, the overwhelming vast majority of “medical
marijuana” is dispensed to casual users who have gone to specialized MDs who are willing to prescribe
marijuana without so much as a medical consultation or even seeing the “patient.” As a result, the
customer showing up at the grow next door (at 2:00 a.m.) is probably already high, frequently in need
of cash, and almost certainly has, or soon will have a criminal record.
Where there is marijuana there are guns. The growers, typically already heavily invested in the
criminal world, recognize that their crop is highly prized by other criminals who have managed to get
what they need in the past without the need to obey existing laws or get prescriptions. As such, they
frequently don’t see much of a need to comply now. Growers are keen to protect their crop and are
willing to use deadly force to that end. Although one could legitimately argue that every citizen has the
right to use deadly force to protect their home, we need to remember that in this case, the business
owner (the home’s occupant) is exposed to a psychoactive substance 24 hours per day, seven days
per week, may very well be high, probably has an history of other controlled substance abuse and is
about to unload live rounds to protect his stash.
Where there are drugs, there are more drugs. The root of the medical marijuana grower and user lies
deeply in the soil of the criminal world. Typically, but not always, the medical marijuana customers, if
not the growers, are also involved in other illegal drug activity. It is common to find medical marijuana
grow homes that are now also contaminated with methamphetamine, cocaine, and a variety of other
drugs.
Investment Stewardship
Landlords and banks are frequently the victims of the medical marijuana grow debacle. Contaminated
properties are expensive to remediate; especially if the grower was involved in methamphetamine
production or use. Structural damage is common and requires expensive repairs.![[Structural
modifications]](
http://www.forensic-applications.com/marijuana/structural.jpg)
Waste products such as fertilizers and other materials may have been dumped into the backyard, down
the into city sewer system, or the domestic sewerage system with resultant damage to the septic tank
and leach field. Residual odors, although perhaps not toxicologically significant can be extremely
difficult to expel and may prevent the full use and enjoyment of the property – it may also result in a
stigmatized property; damaging the market value of the property.
Furthermore, since there are no widely accepted cleanup levels for THC, even when a property is
remediated, how clean does it have to be before the landlord or the seller is absolved of toxic tort
liability? Most property investment facilities are not willing to be the source of case history to find out.
Having said this, remediating a grow house may not be difficult in many cases and does not usually
require gutting the property. The biggest problem in remediating a grow house is getting rid of the odor
of marijuana; that can be very difficult.
Processing marijuana oil, black tar, etc, is still illegal even in legal medical marijuana grows. The
individuals involved in these activities have little concept of chemical safety or good chemical handling
practices. As a result, in this respect, those operations are not unlike a meth-lab and can present
terrible residual chemical hazards for unsuspecting building occupants and future occupants unless
properly remediated.
Recognizing a Former Grow Op
When purchasing a new home, a perspective homebuyer may have clues available to them to alert them
to the possibility the home was a grow op. Contrary to the information provided on a popular TV Show
hosted by a Canadian Home Inspector, the typical Home Inspector should not be expected to be
capable of identifying a grow operation (or a methlab, or other forms of illegal activities). Home
Inspectors are excellent at identifying structural, electrical, plumbing, code and other issues associated
with a property. However, the interpretation of those observations within the context of controlled
substances is simply not within a Home Inspector’s job description.
Home owners can protect themselves to some extent with tell-tale signs that may indicate the need for
further investigations. Such visual indicators can include visual signs of tape marks around door and
windows. Growers frequently will tape high density aluminized plastic over doors and windows; the
residual tape marks are evident after the material has been removed.
Marijuana leaves a distinctive odor behind that can linger for years. The odor is reminiscent of a
“skunk-like” odor.
Holes cut into walls for no apparent reason – occasionally such holes may still have duct work inserted.
Heavily modified electrical junction boxes that defy the explanation of the competent Home Inspector.
Modifications to the ventilation system that don’t seem to make sense.
Stressed vegetation on the exterior property grounds.
Unusual colonization of moulds on surfaces.
Police records are not reliable sources of information since the police may not have the authority to
maintain a record of the activity. Stories from the neighbors however are not subject to such
regulatory constraints, and the neighbors may have telling stories about the activities of the previous
occupants.
Trellises and hooks in unusual locations (such as in the attic); or lines strung across the ceiling, walls or
in the attic.
Unusually elevated electrical bills accumulated by the previous occupant.
Although none of the above indicators can be considered conclusive, the presence of one or more may
be sufficient for a perspective home buyer to escalate to the next level of inspection – quantitative
assessment. In a quantitative assessment, an Industrial Hygienist can enter the property and perform
sampling pursuant to good sampling theory and conclusively confirm or refute the presence of
compounds that are associated with legal marijuana grows, as well as illegal operations, and clandestine
drug labs.
Conclusion
The legality of the operation does not separate the grower or the user from the dark criminal world from
which the industry grew. Most grow ops remain an untested toxic tort proving ground for landlords,
lenders and insurance companies.
About the Author
Mr. Connell has been nominated as a peer subject matter expert for the Department of Defense/FBI
InterAgency Board for the Health, Medical, and Responder Safety SubGroup. He is a member of the
American Industrial Hygiene Association, and the Occupational Hygiene Society of Ireland.
Mr. Connell is a consulting Industrial Hygienist for Forensic Applications Consulting Technologies, Inc.
who offer his Industrial Hygiene consultation services on a commercial basis to landlords, insurance
providers, home buyers and others. Parties interesting in securing the services of Mr. Connell and
FACTs are invited to contact us directly.
A discussion concerning myths surrounding duct cleaning, can be found by clicking here.
For a discussion concerning indoor air quality, click here.
For issues surrounding the history and cause of carpal tunnel syndrome click here.
For a discussion concerning indoor radon click here.
For a discussion concerning the myths associated with laboratory fume hood face velocities click here.
For a discussion concerning laboratory fume hood evaluations, click here.
Finally, for a listing of documents associated with the ground-breaking State of Colorado regulations
concerning methamphetamine laboratories (meth-labs), click here.
Grow operations present their largest threat and nuisance while in operations. After the grower has
moved on, and the structure is no longer occupied, some residual hazards may persist. Hazards can
include chemical exposures (to the crop, the chemicals used to facilitate the crop, and other commonly
associated controlled substances). Hazards can include structural hazards, including unauthorized
modifications to the structure itself, electrical, ventilation and plumbing systems.
In conclusion, just because a grow op may be legal does not automatically confer a guarantee of
prudence or safety. The legality of the operation does not affect the inherent hazards of conducting an
industrial process in a residential setting.
Mr. Connell has been a practicing Industrial Hygienist for over 20 years. As a former analytical chemist
and a current active sworn law enforcement officer, he has specialized training in chemical aspects of
controlled substance situations. Mr. Connell has conducted over 150 clandestine drug lab
assessments.![[Field of Dreams]](
http://www.forensic-applications.com/marijuana/author.jpg)
This page was created on February 1, 2010.
Visitors to this site frequently have questions about other kinds of indoor pollutants or controlled
substances.
To visit our “state-of-knowledge” mould page, click here.
A discussion concerning myths and scams surrounding sampling and testing for indoor moulds click here.
![]() | Forensic Applications Consulting Technologies, Inc. |
Feel free to send Forensic Applications, Inc. an email directly by clicking here
![[185 Bounty
Hunter's Lane, Bailey, Colorado Phone 303-903-7494]](http://www.forensic-applications.com/addressjpg.jpg)